Partners.
There is no logo wall on this page, and that is deliberate.
Why not
A logo wall is the cheapest thing to fake in this sector. A pilot that went nowhere, a conversation that never closed and a signed contract all look identical once they are a grey PNG in a row of six.
So we will put a name here when there is real work behind it and the partner has agreed to be named. Until then the honest answer is that this page is short.
You should discount anybody’s logo wall, including the one we eventually build.
Named partners
[CONFIRM: named partners, with written consent from each, and one sentence per partner describing the actual work. If the list is empty at launch, leave this section saying so rather than filling it.]
Three kinds of partnership
What working together actually means.
Platforms that build on it
You run agents, and your customers eventually need to transact with parties you do not control. We supply the settlement, the identity and the proof; you keep the relationship and the product.
Operators who supply capacity
Compute, measured and anchored, paid against what is actually delivered. This is the one that keeps the network in many hands.
Institutions that need evidence
Insurers, auditors and anyone whose job is to price or examine what a machine did. You need a record that verifies without trusting the party who produced it. That is the thing we built.
What we ask
That claims made about the partnership are ones both sides can substantiate. We will not describe a pilot as a deployment, and we will ask you not to either.
If one of those is you, the first conversation is short.
Tell us what breaks today when a counterparty turns out to be unreliable. That is usually enough to know whether this is worth either side’s time.
Talk to us